Act of Spiritual Communion
The Act of Spiritual Communion
What is an act of spiritual communion? And what is its historical background? This article will explore Traditional prayers, the advantages and disadvantages of making one, and theological reasons for doing so. In addition, we will examine some Disadvantages of spiritual communion and theological bases for its use. We will conclude with some practical and theological applications of the act of spiritual communion. The idea of communion has long been central to Christianity. The Council of Trent has reinforced its importance and the concept of communion.
The intention to unite with Christ in prayer is a powerful tool in the practice of the Catholic faith. Traditional prayer as an act of spiritual communion can be used as a substitute for Holy Communion by a Catholic unable to attend Mass. St. Alphonsus of Liguori wrote a spiritual communion prayer in the 1700s. Pastors of every church celebrate a daily Mass. They are joined in attendance by the communion of saints.
Acts of spiritual communion
Acts of spiritual communion are a daily practice for Catholics. They can be done in many ways, including prayer in front of the Blessed Sacrament. This is especially helpful for Catholics who are not able to receive the Eucharist. This type of communion is a loving gesture and disposition of the heart, and it can even be done in times of crisis. Here are three ways to practice spiritual communion. Listed below are examples of both acts of spiritual communion and the proper way to practice them.
One of the most common forms of spiritual communion is meditating on the Eucharist. During this practice, one will draw closer to the Blessed Sacrament and increase his grace. The Eucharist preserves and increases the life of the soul. It increases charity and the hope of eternal life. Saint Jean-Marie Vianney compared acts of spiritual communion to blowing on embers. While this may seem like a small thing, it has profound benefits.
Disadvantages of making a spiritual communion
A few years ago, there were no barriers to making spiritual communion, and Catholics were more likely to participate. Today, Catholics are not so sure. While Pope Benedict recommends making spiritual communion, the post-conciliar Catechism of the Catholic Church doesn't mention it either. Still, spiritual communion isn't something most Catholics practice. And it deserves a fresh look. We'll examine its advantages and disadvantages and offer some suggestions for a better way forward.
The Catholic Church's sacramental practices are under threat, and many Catholics are no longer able to attend Mass. Due to the threat of the coronavirus, bishops in many parts of the world have suspended participation in Masses. But Catholics around the world are joining Masses virtually, streaming priests' live broadcasts on social media, and Pope Francis has even called for spiritual communion. Despite these challenges, many Catholics are still finding ways to participate in Mass.
Despite the many disadvantages of making spiritual communion, it remains a legitimate theological practice and has had a beneficial effect over centuries. The decrees of the Council of Trent and the Roman Catechism (1567) both refer to it, recognizing its salubrious effects. By virtue of its theological legitimacy, spiritual communion provides a spiritual share in the sacrifice of Christ through desire and love. Moreover, it is as good as receiving the sacramental Eucharist in terms of spiritual union and communion with the body.
Theological basis for making a spiritual communion
The Church's Eucharistic celebrations, while separate from the Lord, still express a communion of the faithful that is valid. This unity creates an organically structured community that brings together believers as one Body. It also creates a suitable means of visible union. In particular, communion consists of sharing the Eucharist in common with others, whether in a church or through other social institutions. However, it is not a valid symbol of unity in and of itself.
Theological reasons for making a spiritual communion can be found in several sources. For instance, the Summa theologiae, II-II, article 23 makes a connection between the sacrament of communion and the virtue of hope. Br. Joseph Selinger, OP, also made this connection. These theological arguments support the practice of spiritual communion. Regardless of the form, the benefits of it cannot be denied.
As Christians, we are part of the Church, which is also a communion of saints. As such, our common participation in the Eucharist and in the teachings of the Apostles is the source of our invisible communion with saints. This bond between believers fosters spiritual solidarity and effective union in charity. So, when we make a spiritual communion with the Church, we are not only sharing the same bread, but also the same bread, wine, and wine.
In medieval times, the Church emphasised the importance of spiritual reception over the corporal reception. The Paschasian view, on the other hand, tied salvation to physical consumption of the eucharistized bread. In other words, this view emphasized the importance of imitating Christ through faith and love. It is also important to note that some medieval authors held that spiritual reception is possible without the physical reception. Theological basis for making a spiritual communion is more important than the content.
There are many ways to make a spiritual communion. While the traditional prayer of spiritual communion was a Catholic practice, the Catholic Church has recognized it as a beneficial spiritual practice. Saints like Padre Pio practiced it throughout the day, and he hoped to be united with Jesus in all he did. These saints' example are a testament to its effectiveness. They believed that spiritual communion was an excellent means to increase our love of God.